What is the relationship between watching TV and Global Warming? (3 ways through which TV causes global warming)

In this article, it shall be discussed what is the relationship between TV use and global warming. Other aspects covered would be :

  • What is global warming?
  • How does watching TV contribute to global warming?
  • How does TV production cause global warming?
  • How does TV use cause global warming?
  • How does TV disposal cause global warming?
  • FAQs

What is the relationship between watching TV and Global Warming?

There is a direct and blunt relationship between global warming and TV use. This relationship can be expressed through three frames; how tv is produced, how tv is used, and how tv is disposed of. 

It is seen that the production of TVs involves the use of nitrogen trifluoride, a greenhouse gas which is 17,000 times stronger than carbon dioxide. TV production is also done using non-renewable resources and non-biodegradable synthetic polymers. 

The use of TV can also cause global warming because it is expended at the cost of energy driven by fossil fuels. This type of energy is produced when a plethora of harmful GHG are emitted into the environment. 

The incorrect disposal of TVs made from hazardous and non-biodegradable materials can also stem environmental issues including global warming because these materials will not degrade and will leach harmful chemicals and gases into the atmosphere.

What is global warming?

It is impossible to build a stance on the relation between global warming and watching television unless global warming is understood in detail. 

As the name suggests, global warming is the warming or heating of the globe, our world. In other words, it is the rise in the overall temperature of the Earth. This increase is primarily caused by greenhouse gases. 

To proceed further, it is important to know what the greenhouse effect is. A greenhouse is a small glass house that is used to keep plants. It is designed in a way to keep heat within so the optimal temperature conditions may be met which are essential for the plants. 

In general, a greenhouse is an effective method that uses sunlight to build the required temperature. However, the problem is that some gases like Carbon Dioxide are acting in a way that is making the whole world a greenhouse. 

This implies that the whole world is a massive greenhouse, retaining heat from sunlight. This results in a rise in global temperatures which is regarded as global warming. 

As per studies, there are more than 10 greenhouse gases that are responsible for the global rise of temperature. These are: 

  • Carbon dioxide
  • Carbon monoxide
  • Methane 
  • Nitrous oxide
  • CFCs
  • Water vapours
  • Nitrogen trifluoride
  • Sulphur hexafluoride 

These gases are responsible for the overall rise in global temperatures. It is because of this effect that the average global temperature has increased by more than 1.1 degrees celsius which is unprecedented and claimed to be catastrophic. 

This rise in temperature then further results in a number of different anomalies as well. When global temperatures rise at unsustainable rates, it results in the melting of glaciers. The melting of glaciers then further results in the rise of sea levels and unprecedented weather complications. 

It is often claimed that the engine of the earth is lineage and linkage. Therefore, global temperature increases at abnormal rates, which results in the disruption of every system on the planet. 

Some of these reciprocated results may be: 

  • Melting of glaciers
  • Disruption of ecosystems
  • The rise in sea levels
  • Habitat destruction 
  • Unprecedented weather anomalies
  • Loss of crop 
  • Floods & droughts 
  • Pest & insect attacks 

These are only a fraction of the effects of global warming that science has unravelled. Further unravelling is anticipated as well. 

How does watching TV contribute to global warming? (3 ways through which TV causes global warming)

This question can be answered through a variety of frames. Watching television does have a direct and blunt relationship with global warming but to understand this relationship, one needs to assess the various factors anchored with TVs such as:

  • Its production 
  • Its use 
  • Its disposal 

In the next sections, a detailed analysis will be done to highlight the said relationship. 

How does TV production cause global warming?

TV has become an important necessity for every household. But have you ever wondered what it takes to make the TV that you boost off with your friends and peers? Have you ever analysed the materials used to make a TV and what is the source of those materials?

If you haven’t, then fret not. You are in the right place. In this section, we will cover how TV is produced or manufactured and what sources are employed for this task. 

It was just discussed that there is a multitude of gases that contribute to the greenhouse effect on the planet (global warming) and that is why they are called greenhouse gases. 

One such was nitrogen trifluoride. Nitrogen trifluoride is regarded as a very potent and harmful greenhouse gas. It is considered to be 17,000 times more potent than carbon dioxide. 

This gas may remain in the environment for as long as 500 years, meaning that it is non-degradable. It is also not controlled by environmental agreements and that is why its production rate is expected to be at 4000 tons. 

To further exacerbate, it is expected that the production of nitrogen trifluoride may increase more than double. These figures speak for themselves. 

If you are wondering why we are narrating the devil of the story here, then your guess is right. The production of television does involve the use of nitrogen trifluoride gas which is 17,000 times more potent than carbon dioxide. 

The story does not end here. The production of television is done by using non-renewable sources of energy. These resources are also directly contributing to global warming because of the release of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. 

Another factor that links the production of TV with global warming is the use of non-biodegradable materials like synthetic polymers. A huge portion of TVs is manufactured by using non-biodegradable but recyclable plastics. 

These plastics are direct contributors to global warming because the production of these synthetic polymers is done by using harmful chemicals and non-renewable resources which contribute to the issue and notion of global warming in a direct manner. 

What are the impacts of non-biodegradable plastic?

The need for biodegradable waste has already been asserted and made fervent in the last section. Here we will assess some of the impacts that non-biodegradable plastic has on the environment. 

These effects can be: 

  • Pollution
  • Global warming
  • GHG emissions
  • Rise in temperature
  • A rise in sea levels
  • Melting glaciers
  • More floods
  • Frequent droughts
  • Unprecedented weather patterns
  • Insects attacks
  • Land degradation
  • Food shortage
  • Food security concerns
  • Species endangerment 
  • Infiltration into the food chains
  • Loss of aquatic life
  • Accumulation of plastics
  • Disruptions of ecosystems

However, it may also be asserted that the effects of non-biodegradable waste are not just limited to the environment, they are also impactful on health as well. Below are the common health issues that arise from non-biodegradable plastic:

  • Abnormality
  • Reproductive complications
  • Hormonal issues
  • Damage to foetus
  • Necrosis
  • Skin damage
  • Eye allergies
  • Organ defects
  • Cancer
  • Mutation
  • Psychological complication
  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Neuro-toxicity
  • Neurological complications 

These are some of the issues caused by the existence of non-biodegradable waste. In the light of mentioned facts, it is proposed that non-biodegradable waste is blunt harm and threat to life and life-supporting systems. 

How does TV use cause global warming?

The use of TV is yet another ground-breaking aspect that creates a strong bond between TV and the issue of global warming. 

As per statistical digging, there are more than 1.7 billion TV households. An average tv may take up 107 kWh of electricity per year. Now, if you take a product of 107 and 1.7 billion, the results will be beyond staggering. 

This is an important concern because, in the majority of the cases, the TVs are run by using non-renewable resources of energy. This energy is obtained by the burning of fossil fuels which leads to the discharge of large amounts of greenhouse gases into the environment. 

That is why there is also a link between TV use and global warming. 

How does TV disposal cause global warming?

It has been detailed that TVs are made from a large number of plastic materials. These plastics are synthetic polymers that are also non-biodegradable. The incorrect disposal of TVs may result in the discharge of harmful chemicals from the materials that make up a TV. 

To further proceed, it is important to know what biodegradability is and how it is related to global warming. By clarifying this chain, a direct relationship between global warming and TV disposal can be established. 

Biodegradability is a process through which complex materials are broken down into simple materials by the action of microbes. These microbes can be bacteria, fungi, viruses, protozoa, and even yeast. 

The process of biodegradability can be called a natural dustbin because it is nature’s way to ensure that there is no waste accumulation in the environment. It is coded in the profile of nature that waste has harmful impacts on the environment. 

The harmful impacts of waste are not just restricted to the environment but also the life that resides within it. If there is no biodegradation, there will be waste and deterioration of life and our atmosphere, in short, a global catastrophe. 

Regarding biodegradability, it is generally thought that there are two types of waste. These are biodegradable and non-biodegradable. 

The disposal of TVs is yet another problem that contributes to the issue of global warming because the materials that are involved in the making of TV are not biodegradable and hence are linked to many harmful impacts including global warming. 

Conclusion

It is concluded that there is a direct and blunt relationship between global warming and TV use. This relationship can be expressed through three frames; how tv is produced, how tv is used, and how tv is disposed of. 

It is seen that the production of TVs involve the use of nitrogen trifluoride, a greenhouse gas which is 17,000 times stronger than carbon dioxide. The production of TV is also done by using non-renewable resources and non-biodegradable synthetic polymers. 

The use of TV can also cause global warming because it is expended at the cost of energy driven from fossil fuels. This type of energy is produced when a plethora of harmful GHG are emitted into the environment. 

The incorrect disposal of TVs made from hazardous and non-biodegradable materials can also stem environmental issues including global warming because these materials will not degrade and will leach harmful chemicals and gases into the atmosphere.

Frequently Asked Questions: What is the relationship between watching TV and Global Warming?

How long does TV take to degrade?

TV is made from non-biodegradable synthetic polymers which may degrade in some hundred years. Some of these might even take a thousand years to degrade. 

Can TVs be hazardous to human health?

Yes, TVs can be harmful to human health in both direct and indirect ways. TVs can cause environmental anomalies which will harm humans eventually. TVs also contain harmful materials which can release toxic substances harmful to human health.

References

  • Change, P. C. (2018). Global warming of 1.5° C. World Meteorological Organization: Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Harvey, L. D. (2018). Global warming. Routledge.
  • Kutilek, M., & Nielsen, D. R. (2009). Facts about global warming.
  • Sample, Ian. (July 3, 2008). Environment risk from flat TV screens. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2008/jul/03/scienceofclimatechange.climatechange

What was missing from this post which could have made it better?

Leave a Comment